The House Select Subcommittee for the Coronavirus Pandemic (@COVIDOversight) chaired by Rep. Brad Wenstrup will hold a crucially important hearing on Tuesday, October 24th. It must be used to expose and lay the groundwork for preventing an assault on our Constitution and national sovereignty by the World Health Organization, the Chinese Communist Party and other enablers.
The United Nations, like the WHO, wants to take over operations that should be run by our own government in case of any event on earth or in outer space that it deems an “emergency.”
The “One Health” concept has been gaining traction among public health policymakers in recent years — but questions remain about what One Health really means, who’s behind the concept and whether what started out as a sound idea has since been hijacked by individuals or groups that see it as a means to expand their power.
Reggie Littlejohn on Bannon’s WarRoom urges everyone to sign the declaration on SovereigntyCoalition.org: Congress needs to wake up, protect our sovereignty and #ExitTheWHO.
Beijing is pushing to become a public health superpower—and quickly found a willing international partner.
Diagnostic codes that allow health care providers to collect data on people who decline COVID-19 shots are raising questions in Congress.
As part of the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI), Beijing announced the concept of a “Health Silk Road” (HSR) in 2015. Like the BRI itself, the HSR is very much an incarnation of Beijing’s global ambitions, argues Jacob Mardell.
The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday said it is “assured” that the novel coronavirus, which has turned into a global pandemic, is “natural in origin” — this as the U.S. is increasingly eyeing a lab in Wuhan, China, as where the deadly outbreak may have started.
The coronavirus pandemic will offer many lessons in what to do better to save more lives and do less economic harm the next time. But there’s already one way to ensure future pandemics are less deadly: Reform or defund the World Health Organization (WHO).
The WHO’s Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has shown an evident bias to accept Chinese declarations and denials at face value – this has created a delay in international responses.. This in spite of a very limited Chinese contribution to WHO, but it matches the weakness of other UN organizations in the face of China’s powerful campaigning. As China itself has reversed course on the epidemic, the WHO becomes once more an irreplaceable tool in health emergencies.
China’s decision to lock down Wuhan, a city of 11 million people, shows how committed the authorities are to contain a viral outbreak that emerged in a seafood market there, a World Health Organization representative in Beijing said.